Author: Hanna Carlsson;

Privatization is produced by this pattern as a much larger and transformative question than would have been the case had only associated with the operation of activity. To leave the old is a positively charged large discourse. The key words (the development, improvement etc) are optimistic and reveal a belief in the future, and in a general context had interpretation perhaps stay there. However, it has been established that the library, according Audun’s institutional perspective, characterized by some of the library-specific standards of the change is not pursued. Way to see the great discourse to leave the old as advocating change, not only of themselves but also the mode of operation out of several different aspects of libraries, can thus be seen as a challenge or even with criticism of the (more or less traditionally driven) libraries, and thus in extension, of those who run them and work on them. As one of the statements in the material was: “I interpret this as an underlying criticism of us library managers’ .135 In the light of the reasoning in the preceding paragraph, such an interpretation neither unreasonable or unjust. Since large discourse to leave the old in such far consists of discourses such as development, modification, improvement, etc., adjacent preparation of privatization almost to what might be called a change eagerness not seem to find much worth preserving. It is not unusual with statements that mean that libraries need to change to

Articles, Bibliometrics, Library Science, Research
Audun Johansson, change, discourse analysis, Fairclough, library, privatization, the library's core values